1. Web1.0-> web2.0-> what next? Have you tracked the technology on this front?
Next is web 3.0, for more details on web3.0 please visit our blog page web3.0. Technology front has been explored very briefly, as we looking this from view point of business managers.
Group2
2. With so much of information at disposal how do you think regulation can be handled?
Any kind of regulation will defeat the spirit of free web. We believe as users of web will mature so will organizations involve in this domain. With this concept of self regulation will come and they will behave more responsibly to safeguard their image and brand.
Group 7: FINO
3. What is the role of “Silverlight” kind of technologies in Web 2.0?
Silverlight is the next step towards user experience in enriching today’s Web2.0 technology. Microsoft Silverlight is a web application framework with added interactivity features and supports DOT NET language and development tools. It is basically a programming model to develop and distribute Rich Internet Applications (RIAs). It is a free cross browser plug-in for delivering multimedia experiences for the web. It is considered as an Adobe flash alternative.
Silverlight offers the power needed for smart client business apps, with the best deployment and navigation characteristics of the web. Silverlight applications are going to make a difference to websites in a very real way in the near future. And this is exactly the goal of Web 2.0 too. Web 2.0 needs the support of these technologies to flourish its applications.
For further information check out our article “Technologies of Web 2.0”
4. Don’t you think Web 3.0 (with browser tracking user preferences) being talked about would make Web 2.0 outdated?
The classic example of the Web 2.0 era is the “mash-up” — for example, connecting a rental-housing Web site with Google Maps to create a new, more useful service that automatically shows the location of each rental listing.
In contrast, the Holy Grail for developers of the semantic Web is to build a system that can give a reasonable and complete response to a simple question like: “I’m looking for a warm place to vacation and I have a budget of $3,000. Oh, and I have an 11-year-old child.”
That is Web 3.0. The Web 3.0 browser will analyze your response, search the Internet for all possible answers, and then organize the results for you. While Web 3.0 might now have a concept to hang itself on, we will remain in the midst of the Web 2.0 era for several more years. The semantic Web is still incubating and will take many turns of the crank to become main stream. So, it is not that Web 2.0 will be erased immediately but as the technology develops and gets bigger and better, the older versions have to be replaced at the end of the day.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle–the living and breathing social Web along with semantic Web technologies will help create a new infrastructure for the information Web that is far different and more powerful than what we call Web 2.0.
Group 9
5. A coin always has two sides. Where the positives of Web 2.0 are innumerable, at the same time it has brought along with it an era of fraud and loss of privacy. What is your take on this and what would you suggest for Web 3.0 and further?
As we said during our presentation that we agree to the fact that Web 2.0 and for that matter the entire Internet world poses lots of security issues but again at the end of the day, you or I are not ready to leave this scenario despite of knowing the treats. It is an individual’s choice. There are still many people who would not prefer shopping or transacting online because they feel it is not safe. They have made their choice and you have to make yours.
But yes, developers of these technologies cannot leave the privacy and security issues unattended and they are actually working over addressing the issues in Web 3.0. The content filtering in Web 3.0 will be advanced and there is an idea of passing by reference instead of exposing objects in transit which could be good for security. But, currently all these ideas can only be anticipated and we will have to wait for the formal launch of Web 3.0 to know further.
Group 13
6. WikiLeaks- a boon/ baneful output of web2.0. How would you address output of web2.0. How would you address cases where some government –sensitive info is also open for all eyes? How are business in turn adopting to such rapid changes in IT and ICT apps to such rapid changes in IT and ICT apps you talked about?
Yes wikileaks are part of bane that has come with web 2.0,but look at the positive side this may also bring more transparency into ways governments functions across the world. Also this issue of hacking and data theft is not completely unresolved in web2.0. To answer your question regarding business; they are embracing web2.0 with open arms. Because for them boon provided by web2.0 outweighs bane of web2.0.
SOA & Group
7. How different are hardware requirements between web1.0 and web2.0 ?
The main difference in terms of hardware is focus; web1.0 focuses on storage, whereas the main focus of web2.0 is bandwidth as traffic is high. This may lead to higher cost, but overall experience of customer, customer interaction that is gained by web2.0 justifies it.
E-Learning Group
8. How do companies prevent copyright infringement during crowd-sourcing?
The copyright for open source projects is delicate issue, only way companies can addressthis at present is by issuing appropriate licenses. Also there is also a moral issue in this ‘how can make a company have a copy right on a resource which it has acquired from public.
Cloud Computing Group
9. Websites developed using web2.0, are prone to hacking because of more client side scripting language involved in its development. How do you justify this?
We are of opinion that client side scripting makes web 2.0 applications safe from hacking as the code is on the client side; possibility of tampering at server side is reduced. Tampering of client side code inflicts the maximum damage as this is shared resource. The client side could be used to send malicious messages to server but this threat can also be minimized by deploying necessary filters at server.
Open Source Movement Group
10. Web 2.0 has resulted in the proliferation of virtual goods (e.g. small weapons in flash games on social networking sites). What value ads does this have for the world economy?
Virtual goods like flash games, online application have created many small enterprises across the world especially in countries like India. Anybody with a new business idea can start a new business venture with little capital. Though these enterprises are mostly dependent on advertisements for revenue generation, the scale and reach of net has made these businesses sustainable. So contribution of the web 2.0 to world economy would be creation many small scale enterprises and jobs for technical workers.
Kuldeep & Group
11. Web 2.0 saw a change from using different platforms to unified platforms. Hasn’t this led to the formation of giant cartels where Java and XML emerge as leaders and new technologies are not allowed to evolve?
A new technology is usually an improvement over an existing one or completely a breakthrough technology. And any existing technology always poses the threat of being replaced by a new one. Java and XML technologies are the ones which cannot be replaced in the near future as they form the core essence of everything over Internet now days. If you see closely, somewhere a cartel already exists with these technologies being the pioneers and Web 2.0 is just an improvement. I don’t find any issue with these cartels because when a new technology will be developed and if it actually has the power to replace these, then that will happen too. The existing pioneers will always try to save their markets and that is how technological shifts happen and the learning curve grows.